Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v14 0/7] drm/i915/gvt: Dma-buf support for GVT-g

2017-09-03 Thread Gerd Hoffmann
Hi, > > However, I see VFIO_DEVICE_QUERY_GFX_PLANE failures which I think > > should > > not be there.  When the guest didn't define a plane yet I get "No > > such device" > > errors instead of a plane_info struct with fields (drm_format, > > width, height, size) > > set to zero.  I also see "Ba

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v14 0/7] drm/i915/gvt: Dma-buf support for GVT-g

2017-09-03 Thread Zhang, Tina
Thanks Zhi and Gerd for testing v14 patch-set. > -Original Message- > From: Wang, Zhi A > Sent: Friday, August 25, 2017 8:53 PM > To: Gerd Hoffmann ; Zhang, Tina > ; zhen...@linux.intel.com; Lv, Zhiyuan > ; Tian, Kevin ; > alex.william...@redhat.com; ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk; dan...@ffwll.

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v14 0/7] drm/i915/gvt: Dma-buf support for GVT-g

2017-08-25 Thread Wang, Zhi A
Hi Gerd: Thanks for the testing. We will find out the problem and refresh the whole patch series. Thanks, Zhi. -Original Message- From: Gerd Hoffmann [mailto:kra...@redhat.com] Sent: Friday, August 25, 2017 2:47 PM To: Zhang, Tina ; zhen...@linux.intel.com; Lv, Zhiyuan ; Wang, Zhi

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v14 0/7] drm/i915/gvt: Dma-buf support for GVT-g

2017-08-25 Thread Gerd Hoffmann
On Fri, 2017-08-18 at 18:21 +0800, Tina Zhang wrote: > v13->v14: > 1) add PROBE, DMABUF and REGION flags. (Alex) > 2) return -ENXIO when gem proxy object is banned by ioctl. >    (Chris) (Daniel) > 3) add some details about the float pixel format. (Daniel) > 4) add F suffix to the defined name. (Da

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v14 0/7] drm/i915/gvt: Dma-buf support for GVT-g

2017-08-18 Thread Tina Zhang
v13->v14: 1) add PROBE, DMABUF and REGION flags. (Alex) 2) return -ENXIO when gem proxy object is banned by ioctl. (Chris) (Daniel) 3) add some details about the float pixel format. (Daniel) 4) add F suffix to the defined name. (Daniel) 5) refine pixel format table. (Zhenyu) v12->v13: 1) add co