On Fri, 24 Apr 2020, Guru Das Srinagesh wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 09:17:58AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Tue, 21 Apr 2020, Guru Das Srinagesh wrote:
>> > Since the PWM framework is switching struct pwm_state.duty_cycle's
>> > datatype to u64, prepare for this transition by using DIV_RO
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 09:17:58AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Apr 2020, Guru Das Srinagesh wrote:
> > Since the PWM framework is switching struct pwm_state.duty_cycle's
> > datatype to u64, prepare for this transition by using DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL
> > to handle a 64-bit dividend.
> >
> > T
On Tue, 21 Apr 2020, Guru Das Srinagesh wrote:
> Since the PWM framework is switching struct pwm_state.duty_cycle's
> datatype to u64, prepare for this transition by using DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL
> to handle a 64-bit dividend.
>
> To: Jani Nikula
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen
> Cc: David Airlie
> Cc: Daniel V
Since the PWM framework is switching struct pwm_state.duty_cycle's
datatype to u64, prepare for this transition by using DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL
to handle a 64-bit dividend.
To: Jani Nikula
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen
Cc: David Airlie
Cc: Daniel Vetter
Cc: Chris Wilson
Cc: "Ville Syrjälä"
Cc: intel-gfx@lis