Jason: Are you alright with this?
Assuming you are I think we should merge it.
Thanks,
-Lionel
On 29/08/2019 08:26, Zhou, David(ChunMing) wrote:
v6 is fine to me as well, RB on it to go ahead.
Out of curious, why " [PATCH v11 01/10] " is on subject?
-David
-Original Message-
From:
On 29/08/2019 08:26, Zhou, David(ChunMing) wrote:
v6 is fine to me as well, RB on it to go ahead.
Out of curious, why " [PATCH v11 01/10] " is on subject?
v11 is the series on the intel-gfx mailing list which depends on the
timeline semaphore feature in our driver.
That's why I included th
v6 is fine to me as well, RB on it to go ahead.
Out of curious, why " [PATCH v11 01/10] " is on subject?
-David
-Original Message-
From: Lionel Landwerlin
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2019 10:33 PM
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Lionel Landwerlin ; Zhou, David(ChunMing)
; Koen
The Vulkan timeline semaphores allow signaling to happen on the point
of the timeline without all of the its dependencies to be created.
The current 2 implementations (AMD/Intel) of the Vulkan spec on top of
the Linux kernel are using a thread to wait on the dependencies of a
given point to materi
