On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 10:55:09AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 28/04/2017 08:41, Chris Wilson wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> >+static int igt_sync(void *arg)
> >+{
> >+const struct {
> >+const char *name;
> >+u32 seqno;
> >+bool expected;
> >+bo
On 28/04/2017 08:41, Chris Wilson wrote:
[snip]
+static int igt_sync(void *arg)
+{
+ const struct {
+ const char *name;
+ u32 seqno;
+ bool expected;
+ bool set;
+ } pass[] = {
+ { "unset", 0, false, false },
+
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 10:32:58AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 28/04/2017 08:41, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >Track the latest fence waited upon on each context, and only add a new
> >asynchronous wait if the new fence is more recent than the recorded
> >fence for that context. This requires us
On 28/04/2017 08:41, Chris Wilson wrote:
Track the latest fence waited upon on each context, and only add a new
asynchronous wait if the new fence is more recent than the recorded
fence for that context. This requires us to filter out unordered
timelines, which are noted by DMA_FENCE_NO_CONTEXT.
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 08:41:36AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Track the latest fence waited upon on each context, and only add a new
> asynchronous wait if the new fence is more recent than the recorded
> fence for that context. This requires us to filter out unordered
> timelines, which are note
Track the latest fence waited upon on each context, and only add a new
asynchronous wait if the new fence is more recent than the recorded
fence for that context. This requires us to filter out unordered
timelines, which are noted by DMA_FENCE_NO_CONTEXT. However, in the
absence of a universal iden
