Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH igt v4] lib: Attempt to load the module for a missing device

2017-11-15 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Petri Latvala (2017-11-15 11:06:02) > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 09:33:51PM +, Chris Wilson wrote: > > If we asked to open a particular chipset and we find no matching device, > > try again after attempting to load its module. Previously we only did > > this for vgem, which is not automati

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH igt v4] lib: Attempt to load the module for a missing device

2017-11-15 Thread Petri Latvala
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 09:33:51PM +, Chris Wilson wrote: > If we asked to open a particular chipset and we find no matching device, > try again after attempting to load its module. Previously we only did > this for vgem, which is not automatically probed during boot, but if we > want to leave

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH igt v4] lib: Attempt to load the module for a missing device

2017-11-14 Thread Chris Wilson
If we asked to open a particular chipset and we find no matching device, try again after attempting to load its module. Previously we only did this for vgem, which is not automatically probed during boot, but if we want to leave the module unloaded we have to try harder when we need the device. v2