Thanks. :P I'm asking our QA to test this patch with upstream kernel. :P Will
let you know the result once it's done.
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2016 4:36 PM
> To: Wang, Zhi A
> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 01:24:26PM +, Wang, Zhi A wrote:
> > + while ((vtcon = readdir(dir))) {
> > + int fd, len;
> > +
> > + if (strncmp(vtcon->d_name, "vtcon", 5))
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + sprintf(buf, "%s/%s/name", path, vtcon->d_name);
>
Thanks. I'm learning the test framework :P Just have a few questions:
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Wilson [mailto:chris.ickle.wil...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Chris
> Wilson
> Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2016 2:36 PM
> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Chris Wilson ; Wang, Zhi A
>
Ha, I see. Additional signal handler to call the exit handlers. :P
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2016 3:22 PM
> To: Wang, Zhi A
> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH igt] igt: Add basic framework
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 12:17:48PM +, Wang, Zhi A wrote:
> To me, atexit is not reliable. As if something wrong happened during the test
> and an unexpected signal was received, the prog would be aborted. atexit()
> would not work on that case. Better do failsafe work in parent process and
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2016 3:08 PM
> To: Wang, Zhi A
> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH igt] igt: Add basic framework for GVT-g testing
>
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 12:01:02PM +,
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2016 3:08 PM
> To: Wang, Zhi A
> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH igt] igt: Add basic framework for GVT-g testing
>
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 12:01:02PM +,
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 12:01:02PM +, Wang, Zhi A wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk]
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2016 2:55 PM
> > To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > Cc: Wang, Zhi A
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH igt] igt: Add basi
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2016 2:55 PM
> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Wang, Zhi A
> Subject: Re: [PATCH igt] igt: Add basic framework for GVT-g testing
>
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 12:36:06PM +0100,
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 12:36:06PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> +static bool is_gvt_enabled(void)
> +{
> + FILE *file;
> + int value;
> + bool enabled = false;
> +
> + file = fopen("/sys/module/i915/parameters/enable_gvt", "r");
> + if (!file)
> + return false;
> +
>
We don't do anything yet other than try to load the module. Initial
sanity checks to come.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson
Cc: Zhi Wang
---
lib/Makefile.sources | 2 +
lib/igt_gvt.c | 119 +
lib/igt_gvt.h | 33 ++
te
11 matches
Mail list logo
