On Wed, 2017-07-05 at 16:53 -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:
> NAK. You're right that these don't actually give us any advantage over
> just using CRCs and are just slower, however I left these tests in
> here
> moreso just so we had something to actually test the frame dumping
> functions so that we could
On 05/07/17 23:53, Lyude Paul wrote:
NAK. You're right that these don't actually give us any advantage over
just using CRCs and are just slower, however I left these tests in here
moreso just so we had something to actually test the frame dumping
functions so that we could avoid regressing them b
NAK. You're right that these don't actually give us any advantage over
just using CRCs and are just slower, however I left these tests in here
moreso just so we had something to actually test the frame dumping
functions so that we could avoid regressing them by accident since
we're the only users o
The frame dump tests provide no additional functionality over CRC tests
and are considerably slower. Thus, these tests should be considered as
poorer duplicates and removed.
Signed-off-by: Paul Kocialkowski
---
tests/chamelium.c | 53 -
1 file
