On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 04:29:47PM +0200, Petri Latvala wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 02:15:34PM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 01:02:04PM +0200, Petri Latvala wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 10:50:04AM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > > Still completely lacking just
For the record, I pushed this series so I could get the IGT release
out. I'm sure there are various ways this functionality can be
improved, so constructive suggestions are still definitely welcome.
--
Petri Latvala
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gf
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 02:15:34PM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 01:02:04PM +0200, Petri Latvala wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 10:50:04AM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > Still completely lacking justification. The above is a non sequitur;
> > > static testlist generatio
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 01:02:04PM +0200, Petri Latvala wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 10:50:04AM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Still completely lacking justification. The above is a non sequitur;
> > static testlist generation can be done just from the source.
>
> Static testlist generation ca
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 10:50:04AM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Still completely lacking justification. The above is a non sequitur;
> static testlist generation can be done just from the source.
Static testlist generation can be done and it breaks when run on a
kernel without selftests enabled.
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 12:43:56PM +0200, Petri Latvala wrote:
> v2 of the series with miscellaneous fixes.
>
> IGT subtest enumeration must work regardless of what the running
> environment is. Kernel selftest launchers want to expose everything
> the running kernel can execute.
>
> These two th
v2 of the series with miscellaneous fixes.
IGT subtest enumeration must work regardless of what the running
environment is. Kernel selftest launchers want to expose everything
the running kernel can execute.
These two things are mutually exclusive. This series is an attempt for
a best-of-both-wor
