Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 02/25] trace.pl: Ignore signaling on non i915 fences

2019-05-20 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
On 17/05/2019 20:20, Chris Wilson wrote: Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2019-05-17 12:25:03) From: Tvrtko Ursulin gem_wsim uses the sw_fence timeline and confuses the script. sw_sync How does this fare with clflush fences (which are .driver="i915") and all of the future .driver="i915" fences? Lo

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 02/25] trace.pl: Ignore signaling on non i915 fences

2019-05-17 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2019-05-17 12:25:03) > From: Tvrtko Ursulin > > gem_wsim uses the sw_fence timeline and confuses the script. sw_sync How does this fare with clflush fences (which are .driver="i915") and all of the future .driver="i915" fences? Looks like we are still prone to hitting t

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 02/25] trace.pl: Ignore signaling on non i915 fences

2019-05-17 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
From: Tvrtko Ursulin gem_wsim uses the sw_fence timeline and confuses the script. Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin --- scripts/trace.pl | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/scripts/trace.pl b/scripts/trace.pl index b7bbabc79f68..930e502ad8eb 100755 --- a/scripts/trace.pl +++ b/scri