Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests: add pc8

2013-08-13 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 05:43:23PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > 2013/8/6 Daniel Vetter : > > On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 04:33:53PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > >> 2013/8/5 Daniel Vetter : > >> > On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 10:42:08AM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > >> >> 2013/8/5 Daniel Vetter : > >> >> > On

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests: add pc8

2013-08-06 Thread Paulo Zanoni
2013/8/6 Daniel Vetter : > On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 04:33:53PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote: >> 2013/8/5 Daniel Vetter : >> > On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 10:42:08AM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote: >> >> 2013/8/5 Daniel Vetter : >> >> > On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 05:53:27PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote: >> >> The prob

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests: add pc8

2013-08-06 Thread Daniel Vetter
Mabye I should actually cc Damien when I poke him ... -Daniel On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 10:11:02PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 04:33:53PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > > 2013/8/5 Daniel Vetter : > > > On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 10:42:08AM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > > >> 2013/

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests: add pc8

2013-08-06 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 04:33:53PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > 2013/8/5 Daniel Vetter : > > On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 10:42:08AM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > >> 2013/8/5 Daniel Vetter : > >> > On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 05:53:27PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > >> The problem is: let's imagine there's so

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests: add pc8

2013-08-06 Thread Paulo Zanoni
2013/8/5 Daniel Vetter : > On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 10:42:08AM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote: >> 2013/8/5 Daniel Vetter : >> > On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 05:53:27PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote: >> >> From: Paulo Zanoni >> >> >> >> This test chekcs our code that enables Package C8+. The environment >> >> req

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests: add pc8

2013-08-05 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 10:42:08AM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > 2013/8/5 Daniel Vetter : > > On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 05:53:27PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > >> From: Paulo Zanoni > >> > >> This test chekcs our code that enables Package C8+. The environment > >> requirements for this test are quite

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests: add pc8

2013-08-05 Thread Paulo Zanoni
2013/8/5 Daniel Vetter : > On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 05:53:27PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote: >> From: Paulo Zanoni >> >> This test chekcs our code that enables Package C8+. The environment >> requirements for this test are quite complicated: >> - The machine needs to be properly configured to reach

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests: add pc8

2013-08-04 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 05:53:27PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > From: Paulo Zanoni > > This test chekcs our code that enables Package C8+. The environment > requirements for this test are quite complicated: > - The machine needs to be properly configured to reach PC8+ when > possible, which

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests: add pc8

2013-07-29 Thread Paulo Zanoni
From: Paulo Zanoni This test chekcs our code that enables Package C8+. The environment requirements for this test are quite complicated: - The machine needs to be properly configured to reach PC8+ when possible, which means all the power management policies and device drivers must be pr