On ke, 2016-03-02 at 15:28 +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 05:01:19PM +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> [...]
> Hmm, this file has a noticeable lack of GEM domain management. E.g.
> gem_mmap_subtest() will only work by happenstance on !llc with
> gtt_mmap=false.
>
> To test the shrink
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 05:01:19PM +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> Ah right, I missed that, thanks for explaining. But we still need to
> make sure the device is suspended before the set-cache-level call, that
> is an initial disable_all_screens() and then wait_for_suspended()
> before calling set-cache-
On ke, 2016-03-02 at 14:49 +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 04:41:54PM +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> > On ke, 2016-03-02 at 14:37 +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 04:32:41PM +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> > > > On ke, 2016-03-02 at 14:04 +, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 04:41:54PM +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> On ke, 2016-03-02 at 14:37 +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 04:32:41PM +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> > > On ke, 2016-03-02 at 14:04 +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 03:55:56PM +0200, David Weine
On ke, 2016-03-02 at 14:37 +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 04:32:41PM +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> > On ke, 2016-03-02 at 14:04 +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 03:55:56PM +0200, David Weinehall wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 01:27:06PM +, Chris
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 02:04:58PM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 03:55:56PM +0200, David Weinehall wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 01:27:06PM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 03:11:57PM +0200, David Weinehall wrote:
> > > > On machines that lack an
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 04:32:41PM +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> On ke, 2016-03-02 at 14:04 +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 03:55:56PM +0200, David Weinehall wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 01:27:06PM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 03:11:57PM +020
On ke, 2016-03-02 at 14:04 +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 03:55:56PM +0200, David Weinehall wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 01:27:06PM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 03:11:57PM +0200, David Weinehall wrote:
> > > > On machines that lack an LLC the
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 03:55:56PM +0200, David Weinehall wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 01:27:06PM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 03:11:57PM +0200, David Weinehall wrote:
> > > On machines that lack an LLC the pm-caching subtest will
> > > terminate with sigbus and thus C
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 01:27:06PM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 03:11:57PM +0200, David Weinehall wrote:
> > On machines that lack an LLC the pm-caching subtest will
> > terminate with sigbus and thus CRASH during the
> > I915_CACHING_CACHED iteration. This patch adds a che
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 03:11:57PM +0200, David Weinehall wrote:
> On machines that lack an LLC the pm-caching subtest will
> terminate with sigbus and thus CRASH during the
> I915_CACHING_CACHED iteration. This patch adds a check for
> this condition and skips that iteration.
you can delete the
On machines that lack an LLC the pm-caching subtest will
terminate with sigbus and thus CRASH during the
I915_CACHING_CACHED iteration. This patch adds a check for
this condition and skips that iteration.
Signed-off-by: David Weinehall
---
tests/pm_rpm.c | 10 ++
1 file changed, 10 inse
12 matches
Mail list logo
