Quoting Jason Ekstrand (2017-08-09 19:49:34)
> This adds both trivial error-checking tests as well as more complex
> tests which actually test whether or not waits do what they're supposed
> to do. They only currently work on i915 but it should be simple to hook
> them up for other drivers by simp
Quoting Jason Ekstrand (2017-08-09 19:49:34)
> This adds both trivial error-checking tests as well as more complex
> tests which actually test whether or not waits do what they're supposed
> to do. They only currently work on i915 but it should be simple to hook
> them up for other drivers by simp
This adds both trivial error-checking tests as well as more complex
tests which actually test whether or not waits do what they're supposed
to do. They only currently work on i915 but it should be simple to hook
them up for other drivers by simply implementing the little function
pointer hook prov
Quoting Jason Ekstrand (2017-08-09 18:46:49)
> On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 10:28 AM, Chris Wilson
> wrote:
>
> Quoting Jason Ekstrand (2017-08-09 18:04:42)
> > This adds both trivial error-checking tests as well as more complex
> > tests which actually test whether or not waits do what th
On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 10:28 AM, Chris Wilson
wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> Key tests missing here are signal (SIGINT) handling, especially how the
> timeout parameters is handled on repeats, see igt_interruptible(), though
> you must use igt_ioctl().
I'll see what I can do
> Polling multiple handles
On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 10:28 AM, Chris Wilson
wrote:
> Quoting Jason Ekstrand (2017-08-09 18:04:42)
> > This adds both trivial error-checking tests as well as more complex
> > tests which actually test whether or not waits do what they're supposed
> > to do. They only currently work on i915 but
Hi Jason,
On 9 August 2017 at 18:04, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> +/* One one tenth of a second */
> +#define SHORT_TIME_NSEC 1ull
Er, a hundredth? Or only one, one tenth?
> +static void
> +test_wait_illegal_handle(int fd)
> +{
> + struct drm_syncobj_wait wait = { 0 };
> + uint32
Quoting Jason Ekstrand (2017-08-09 18:04:42)
> This adds both trivial error-checking tests as well as more complex
> tests which actually test whether or not waits do what they're supposed
> to do. They only currently work on i915 but it should be simple to hook
> them up for other drivers by simp
This adds both trivial error-checking tests as well as more complex
tests which actually test whether or not waits do what they're supposed
to do. They only currently work on i915 but it should be simple to hook
them up for other drivers by simply implementing the little function
pointer hook prov
This adds both trivial error-checking tests as well as more complex
tests which actually test whether or not waits do what they're supposed
to do. They only currently work on i915 but it should be simple to hook
them up for other drivers by simply implementing the little function
pointer hook prov
10 matches
Mail list logo
