On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 01:46:23PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> From: Tvrtko Ursulin
>
> Measures DRM_IOCTL_MODE_SETCRTC and DRM_IOCTL_MODE_SETPLANE as proxy for
> drm_atomic_helper_update_plane if I got it right.
>
> Discovered some slow cursor updates (1.6ms) so needed something to test
> di
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
Measures DRM_IOCTL_MODE_SETCRTC and DRM_IOCTL_MODE_SETPLANE as proxy for
drm_atomic_helper_update_plane if I got it right.
Discovered some slow cursor updates (1.6ms) so needed something to test
different kernel configs etc.
v2:
* Move to a test case and fail if ioctl ta
On 24 April 2015 at 16:27, Tvrtko Ursulin
wrote:
> From: Tvrtko Ursulin
>
> Measures DRM_IOCTL_MODE_SETCRTC and DRM_IOCTL_MODE_SETPLANE as proxy for
> drm_atomic_helper_update_plane if I got it right.
>
> Discovered some slow cursor updates (1.6ms) so needed something to test
> different kernel c
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 04:27:58PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> From: Tvrtko Ursulin
>
> Measures DRM_IOCTL_MODE_SETCRTC and DRM_IOCTL_MODE_SETPLANE as proxy for
> drm_atomic_helper_update_plane if I got it right.
>
> Discovered some slow cursor updates (1.6ms) so needed something to test
> di
On 04/24/2015 04:27 PM, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
Measures DRM_IOCTL_MODE_SETCRTC and DRM_IOCTL_MODE_SETPLANE as proxy for
drm_atomic_helper_update_plane if I got it right.
Discovered some slow cursor updates (1.6ms) so needed something to test
different kernel configs etc.
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
Measures DRM_IOCTL_MODE_SETCRTC and DRM_IOCTL_MODE_SETPLANE as proxy for
drm_atomic_helper_update_plane if I got it right.
Discovered some slow cursor updates (1.6ms) so needed something to test
different kernel configs etc.
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin
---
benchmarks/.g