Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] igt/gem_wait: Relax assertion for wait completion

2018-05-03 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Joonas Lahtinen (2018-05-03 15:05:38) > Quoting Chris Wilson (2018-05-02 14:13:26) > > When waiting for a finite batch, all that we require is that the batch > > completes. If it takes the full second (or longer) for us to wake up and > > notice the completed batch is immaterial, so only as

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] igt/gem_wait: Relax assertion for wait completion

2018-05-03 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
Quoting Chris Wilson (2018-05-02 14:13:26) > When waiting for a finite batch, all that we require is that the batch > completes. If it takes the full second (or longer) for us to wake up and > notice the completed batch is immaterial, so only assert that we don't > report an infinite timeout afterw

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] igt/gem_wait: Relax assertion for wait completion

2018-05-02 Thread Chris Wilson
When waiting for a finite batch, all that we require is that the batch completes. If it takes the full second (or longer) for us to wake up and notice the completed batch is immaterial, so only assert that we don't report an infinite timeout afterwards. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson --- tests/gem_