On Wed, 2016-08-17 at 12:37 +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> On ma, 2016-08-15 at 09:26 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2016-08-15 at 15:34 +0300, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > No idea yet why we would need to limit for rcs only.
> > >
> > I went back and forth; I think I did
On ma, 2016-08-15 at 09:26 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-08-15 at 15:34 +0300, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
> >
> > No idea yet why we would need to limit for rcs only.
> >
> I went back and forth; I think I did test on the BLT ring and maybe one
> of the video rings and things worked on at l
On Mon, 2016-08-15 at 15:34 +0300, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
> Chris Wilson writes:
>
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 02:48:06PM +0300, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Jesse Barnes
> > >
> > > We just need to pass in an address to execute and some flags,
> > > since we
> > > don't have to w
Chris Wilson writes:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 02:48:06PM +0300, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
>> From: Jesse Barnes
>>
>> We just need to pass in an address to execute and some flags, since we
>> don't have to worry about buffer relocation or any of the other usual
>> stuff. Returns a fence to be used
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 02:48:06PM +0300, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
> From: Jesse Barnes
>
> We just need to pass in an address to execute and some flags, since we
> don't have to worry about buffer relocation or any of the other usual
> stuff. Returns a fence to be used for synchronization.
>
> v2:
From: Jesse Barnes
We just need to pass in an address to execute and some flags, since we
don't have to worry about buffer relocation or any of the other usual
stuff. Returns a fence to be used for synchronization.
v2: add a request after batch submission (Jesse)
v3: add a flag for fence creati
