Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/9] drm/i915/bdw: Implement a basic PM interrupt handler

2014-02-17 Thread Ben Widawsky
On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 12:15:12PM -0200, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 2:25 AM, Ben Widawsky > wrote: > > Almost all of it is reusable from the existing code. The primary > > difference is we need to do even less in the interrupt handler, since > > interrupts are not shared in the

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/9] drm/i915/bdw: Implement a basic PM interrupt handler

2014-02-06 Thread S, Deepak
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 9:55 AM, Ben Widawsky mailto:benjamin.widaw...@intel.com>> wrote: Almost all of it is reusable from the existing code. The primary difference is we need to do even less in the interrupt handler, since interrupts are not shared in the same way. The patch i

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/9] drm/i915/bdw: Implement a basic PM interrupt handler

2014-02-06 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 2:25 AM, Ben Widawsky wrote: > Almost all of it is reusable from the existing code. The primary > difference is we need to do even less in the interrupt handler, since > interrupts are not shared in the same way. > > The patch is mostly a copy-paste of the existing snb+ cod

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/9] drm/i915/bdw: Implement a basic PM interrupt handler

2014-01-28 Thread Ben Widawsky
Almost all of it is reusable from the existing code. The primary difference is we need to do even less in the interrupt handler, since interrupts are not shared in the same way. The patch is mostly a copy-paste of the existing snb+ code, with updates to the relevant parts requiring changes to the