Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-08-15 12:51:28)
>
> On 14/08/2018 16:22, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-08-14 15:40:58)
> > Looks like we should be able to hook this up to a selftest to confirm
> > the modification does land in the target context image, and a SRM to
> > confirm
On 14/08/2018 16:22, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-08-14 15:40:58)
+static int
+i915_gem_context_reconfigure_sseu(struct i915_gem_context *ctx,
+ struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
+ struct intel_sseu sseu)
+{
+
On 14/08/2018 19:53, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-08-14 19:44:09)
On 14/08/2018 15:59, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-08-14 15:40:58)
From: Chris Wilson
We want to allow userspace to reconfigure the subslice configuration for
its own use case. To do so
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-08-14 19:44:09)
>
> On 14/08/2018 15:59, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-08-14 15:40:58)
> >> From: Chris Wilson
> >>
> >> We want to allow userspace to reconfigure the subslice configuration for
> >> its own use case. To do so, we expose a contex
On 14/08/2018 15:59, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-08-14 15:40:58)
From: Chris Wilson
We want to allow userspace to reconfigure the subslice configuration for
its own use case. To do so, we expose a context parameter to allow
adjustment of the RPCS register stored within th
On 14/08/18 17:05, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
On 14/08/18 16:18, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2018-08-14 16:11:36)
On 14/08/18 15:59, Chris Wilson wrote:
And I'd still recommend not using indirect access if we can apply the
changes immediately.
-Chris
Hangs on Gen9 :(
How do
On 14/08/18 16:18, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2018-08-14 16:11:36)
On 14/08/18 15:59, Chris Wilson wrote:
And I'd still recommend not using indirect access if we can apply the
changes immediately.
-Chris
Hangs on Gen9 :(
How does modifying the context image of an idle (un
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-08-14 15:40:58)
> +static int
> +i915_gem_context_reconfigure_sseu(struct i915_gem_context *ctx,
> + struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
> + struct intel_sseu sseu)
> +{
> + struct drm_i915_private *i915
Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2018-08-14 16:11:36)
> On 14/08/18 15:59, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > And I'd still recommend not using indirect access if we can apply the
> > changes immediately.
> > -Chris
> >
>
> Hangs on Gen9 :(
How does modifying the context image of an idle (unpinned) context cause
On 14/08/18 15:59, Chris Wilson wrote:
And I'd still recommend not using indirect access if we can apply the
changes immediately.
-Chris
Hangs on Gen9 :(
-
Lionel
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.o
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-08-14 15:40:58)
> From: Chris Wilson
>
> We want to allow userspace to reconfigure the subslice configuration for
> its own use case. To do so, we expose a context parameter to allow
> adjustment of the RPCS register stored within the context image (and
> currently no
From: Chris Wilson
We want to allow userspace to reconfigure the subslice configuration for
its own use case. To do so, we expose a context parameter to allow
adjustment of the RPCS register stored within the context image (and
currently not accessible via LRI). If the context is adjusted before
On 08/05/18 21:56, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-05-03 18:18:43)
On 25/04/2018 12:45, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
From: Chris Wilson
We want to allow userspace to reconfigure the subslice configuration for
its own use case. To do so, we expose a context parameter to allow
adju
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2018-05-03 18:18:43)
>
> On 25/04/2018 12:45, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
> > From: Chris Wilson
> >
> > We want to allow userspace to reconfigure the subslice configuration for
> > its own use case. To do so, we expose a context parameter to allow
> > adjustment of the RPCS
in [mailto:tvrtko.ursu...@linux.intel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 8, 2018 1:25 AM
To: Rogozhkin, Dmitry V ; Landwerlin, Lionel G
; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915: Expose RPCS (SSEU) configuration
to userspace
On 08/05/2018 05:04, Rogozhkin, Dmitry V
tting batch buffers?
Regards,
Tvrtko
*From:*Landwerlin, Lionel G
*Sent:* Friday, May 4, 2018 9:25 AM
*To:* Tvrtko Ursulin ;
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Rogozhkin, Dmitry V
*Subject:* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915: Expose RPCS (SSEU)
configuration to userspace
On 03/05/18
x] [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915: Expose RPCS (SSEU) configuration
to userspace
On 03/05/18 18:18, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
+int intel_lr_context_set_sseu(struct i915_gem_context *ctx,
+ struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
+ struct i915_gem_context_sseu *sseu)
+{
On 03/05/18 18:18, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
+int intel_lr_context_set_sseu(struct i915_gem_context *ctx,
+ struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
+ struct i915_gem_context_sseu *sseu)
+{
+ struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = ctx->i915;
+ struct intel_context *ce;
+
On 25/04/2018 12:45, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
From: Chris Wilson
We want to allow userspace to reconfigure the subslice configuration for
its own use case. To do so, we expose a context parameter to allow
adjustment of the RPCS register stored within the context image (and
currently not access
On 03/05/2018 17:04, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2018-04-26 13:22:30)
On 26/04/18 11:00, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2018-04-25 14:45:21)
From: Chris Wilson
We want to allow userspace to reconfigure the subslice configuration for
its own use case.
On 03/05/18 17:04, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2018-04-26 13:22:30)
On 26/04/18 11:00, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2018-04-25 14:45:21)
From: Chris Wilson
We want to allow userspace to reconfigure the subslice configuration for
its own use case. To
Quoting Joonas Lahtinen (2018-05-03 17:04:31)
> More advanced tactics would include scheduling work so that we try to
> avoid the slice count changes and deduct the switching time from the
> execution budget of the app requesting less slices (if we had fair
> time slicing).
Have you been peeking a
Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2018-04-26 13:22:30)
> On 26/04/18 11:00, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> > Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2018-04-25 14:45:21)
> >> From: Chris Wilson
> >>
> >> We want to allow userspace to reconfigure the subslice configuration for
> >> its own use case. To do so, we expose a co
On 26/04/18 11:00, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2018-04-25 14:45:21)
From: Chris Wilson
We want to allow userspace to reconfigure the subslice configuration for
its own use case. To do so, we expose a context parameter to allow
adjustment of the RPCS register stored within
Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2018-04-25 14:45:21)
> From: Chris Wilson
>
> We want to allow userspace to reconfigure the subslice configuration for
> its own use case. To do so, we expose a context parameter to allow
> adjustment of the RPCS register stored within the context image (and
> currently
From: Chris Wilson
We want to allow userspace to reconfigure the subslice configuration for
its own use case. To do so, we expose a context parameter to allow
adjustment of the RPCS register stored within the context image (and
currently not accessible via LRI). If the context is adjusted before
26 matches
Mail list logo
