Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/8] drm/i915: Use the new vm [un]bind functions

2013-09-14 Thread Chris Wilson
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 06:08:17PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 11:39:30PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 02:57:54PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > > > @@ -464,11 +465,12 @@ i915_gem_execbuffer_reserve_vma(struct i915_vma > > > *vma, > > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/8] drm/i915: Use the new vm [un]bind functions

2013-09-13 Thread Ben Widawsky
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 11:39:30PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 02:57:54PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > > @@ -464,11 +465,12 @@ i915_gem_execbuffer_reserve_vma(struct i915_vma *vma, > > struct intel_ring_buffer *ring, > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/8] drm/i915: Use the new vm [un]bind functions

2013-09-11 Thread Chris Wilson
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 02:57:54PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > @@ -464,11 +465,12 @@ i915_gem_execbuffer_reserve_vma(struct i915_vma *vma, > struct intel_ring_buffer *ring, > bool *need_reloc) > { > - struct drm_i915_private *dev_pri

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/8] drm/i915: Use the new vm [un]bind functions

2013-09-11 Thread Ben Widawsky
From: Ben Widawsky Building on the last patch which created the new function pointers in the VM for bind/unbind, here we actually put those new function pointers to use. Split out as a separate patch to aid in review. I'm fine with squashing into the previous patch if people request it. v2: Upd

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/8] drm/i915: Use the new vm [un]bind functions

2013-08-30 Thread Ben Widawsky
From: Ben Widawsky Building on the last patch which created the new function pointers in the VM for bind/unbind, here we actually put those new function pointers to use. Split out as a separate patch to aid in review. I'm fine with squashing into the previous patch if people request it. v2: Upd