Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/7] drm/i915: prettify MST debug message

2019-10-11 Thread Lucas De Marchi
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 08:14:32PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 10:08:32AM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote: On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 03:08:50PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: >On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 06:09:06PM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote: >> s/?/:/ so it's get correctly colored

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/7] drm/i915: prettify MST debug message

2019-10-11 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 10:08:32AM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 03:08:50PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > >On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 06:09:06PM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > >> s/?/:/ so it's get correctly colored by dmesg. > > > >What do you mean correctly? > > > >The deb

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/7] drm/i915: prettify MST debug message

2019-10-11 Thread Lucas De Marchi
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 03:08:50PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 06:09:06PM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote: s/?/:/ so it's get correctly colored by dmesg. What do you mean correctly? The debug message was asking the question "(is) MST supported?" After this it just declare

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/7] drm/i915: prettify MST debug message

2019-10-11 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 06:09:06PM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > s/?/:/ so it's get correctly colored by dmesg. What do you mean correctly? The debug message was asking the question "(is) MST supported?" After this it just declares that MST is not supported. I guess no real difference so I coul

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/7] drm/i915: prettify MST debug message

2019-10-10 Thread Lucas De Marchi
s/?/:/ so it's get correctly colored by dmesg. Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c index 348a09890611..33a