On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 12:04:51PM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 11:30:16AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > I've merged all the patches Jesse reviewed from this series, expect the
> > one Damien has a bikeshed pending.
>
> It wasn't bikeshedding, we were printing "%c",0 in
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 11:30:16AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> I've merged all the patches Jesse reviewed from this series, expect the
> one Damien has a bikeshed pending.
It wasn't bikeshedding, we were printing "%c",0 instead of "%c",'A' :)
--
Damien
_
On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 10:29:08AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Mar 2014 18:21:29 +0300
> ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
>
> > From: Rafael Barbalho
> >
> > The framecount register was still using the old PIPE macro instead
> > of the new PIPE2 macro
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rafa
On Mon, 31 Mar 2014 18:21:29 +0300
ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Rafael Barbalho
>
> The framecount register was still using the old PIPE macro instead
> of the new PIPE2 macro
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael Barbalho
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 6 +++---
> 1 file chang
From: Rafael Barbalho
The framecount register was still using the old PIPE macro instead
of the new PIPE2 macro
Signed-off-by: Rafael Barbalho
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers
