On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 11:20:15AM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 01:45:23PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 10:31:27AM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > > The iomapping of the register region has historically been a uint32_t
> > > for the obvious reason t
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 01:45:23PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 10:31:27AM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > The iomapping of the register region has historically been a uint32_t
> > for the obvious reason that our PTE size was always 4b. In the future
> > however, we cannot m
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 10:31:27AM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> The iomapping of the register region has historically been a uint32_t
> for the obvious reason that our PTE size was always 4b. In the future
> however, we cannot make this assumption.
>
> By making the type void, it makes the upcomin
The iomapping of the register region has historically been a uint32_t
for the obvious reason that our PTE size was always 4b. In the future
however, we cannot make this assumption.
By making the type void, it makes the upcoming pointer math we will do
much easier, and hopefully gives the compiler
