Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915: Treat DMRRS as static DRRS

2022-05-30 Thread Jani Nikula
On Mon, 30 May 2022, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Fri, 27 May 2022, Ville Syrjala wrote: >> From: Ville Syrjälä >> >> Some machines declare DRRS type = seamless, DRRS = no, DMRRS = yes. >> I *think* DMRRS stands for "dynamcic media refresh rate", and >> I suspect the way it's meant to work is that it

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915: Treat DMRRS as static DRRS

2022-05-30 Thread Jani Nikula
On Fri, 27 May 2022, Ville Syrjala wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä > > Some machines declare DRRS type = seamless, DRRS = no, DMRRS = yes. > I *think* DMRRS stands for "dynamcic media refresh rate", and > I suspect the way it's meant to work is that it lets the driver > switch refresh rates to match

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915: Treat DMRRS as static DRRS

2022-05-27 Thread Ville Syrjala
From: Ville Syrjälä Some machines declare DRRS type = seamless, DRRS = no, DMRRS = yes. I *think* DMRRS stands for "dynamcic media refresh rate", and I suspect the way it's meant to work is that it lets the driver switch refresh rates to match the frame rate for media playback. Obviously for us a