Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915: Resume dissecting intel_gtt

2013-01-29 Thread Ben Widawsky
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 08:40:06AM +, Damien Lespiau wrote: > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 02:45:00PM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote: > > With the probe call in our dispatch table, we can now cut away two of > > the remaining members in the intel_gtt shared struct. > > > > v2: Rebased on top of Daniel's

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915: Resume dissecting intel_gtt

2013-01-29 Thread Damien Lespiau
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 02:45:00PM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote: > With the probe call in our dispatch table, we can now cut away two of > the remaining members in the intel_gtt shared struct. > > v2: Rebased on top of Daniel's series > > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky Shouldn't the commit message be

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915: Resume dissecting intel_gtt

2013-01-25 Thread Ben Widawsky
With the probe call in our dispatch table, we can now cut away two of the remaining members in the intel_gtt shared struct. v2: Rebased on top of Daniel's series Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky --- drivers/char/agp/intel-gtt.c | 36 -- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915: Resume dissecting intel_gtt

2013-01-24 Thread Ben Widawsky
With the probe call in our dispatch table, we can now cut away two of the remaining members in the intel_gtt shared struct. v2: Rebased on top of Daniel's series Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky --- drivers/char/agp/intel-gtt.c | 36 -- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/