On Tue, 2018-05-22 at 07:37 -0700, Tarun Vyas wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 12:51:45PM -0700, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote:
> >
> > While touching the code around this, I noticed that absence of ALPM
> > capability does not stop us from enabling PSR2. But, the spec
> > unambiguously states that AL
On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 12:51:45PM -0700, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote:
> While touching the code around this, I noticed that absence of ALPM
> capability does not stop us from enabling PSR2. But, the spec
> unambiguously states that ALPM is required for PSR2 and so does this
> commit that introduced
On 5/12/2018 1:21 AM, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote:
While touching the code around this, I noticed that absence of ALPM
capability does not stop us from enabling PSR2. But, the spec
unambiguously states that ALPM is required for PSR2 and so does this
commit that introduced this code
drm/i915/psr:
While touching the code around this, I noticed that absence of ALPM
capability does not stop us from enabling PSR2. But, the spec
unambiguously states that ALPM is required for PSR2 and so does this
commit that introduced this code
drm/i915/psr: enable ALPM for psr2
As per edp1.4 spec , alpm
