From: Ben Widawsky
Even though we track object activity and not VMA, because we have the
active_list be based on the VM, it makes the most sense to use VMAs in
the APIs.
NOTE: Daniel intends to eventually rip out active/inactive LRUs, but for
now, leave them be.
v2: Remove leftover hunk from th
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 02:57:52PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> if (from != NULL) {
> - struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv =
> from->obj->base.dev->dev_private;
> - struct i915_address_space *ggtt = &dev_priv->gtt.base;
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 04:43:58PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> From: Ben Widawsky
>
> Even though we track object activity and not VMA, because we have the
> active_list be based on the VM, it makes the most sense to use VMAs in the
> APIs.
>
> NOTE: Daniel intends to eventually rip out active/
From: Ben Widawsky
Even though we track object activity and not VMA, because we have the
active_list be based on the VM, it makes the most sense to use VMAs in the
APIs.
NOTE: Daniel intends to eventually rip out active/inactive LRUs, but for
now, leave them be.
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky
Co
