On Thu, 2019-05-02 at 17:58 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 02 May 2019, "Summers, Stuart"
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2019-05-02 at 10:15 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > > Acked-by: Jani Nikula
> >
> > Jani, based on Daniele's feedback, I'm planning on squashing this
> > patch
> > with the patch tha
On Thu, 02 May 2019, "Summers, Stuart" wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-05-02 at 10:15 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> Acked-by: Jani Nikula
>
> Jani, based on Daniele's feedback, I'm planning on squashing this patch
> with the patch that moves these helper functions to intel_sseu.h. Any
> issue keeping your A
On Thu, 2019-05-02 at 10:15 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Wed, 01 May 2019, "Summers, Stuart"
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2019-05-01 at 14:19 -0700, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio wrote:
> > >
> > > On 5/1/19 2:04 PM, Summers, Stuart wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2019-05-01 at 13:04 -0700, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
> >
On Wed, 01 May 2019, "Summers, Stuart" wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-05-01 at 14:19 -0700, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio wrote:
>>
>> On 5/1/19 2:04 PM, Summers, Stuart wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2019-05-01 at 13:04 -0700, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio wrote:
>> > > Can you elaborate a bit more on what's the rationale for th
On Wed, 2019-05-01 at 14:19 -0700, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio wrote:
>
> On 5/1/19 2:04 PM, Summers, Stuart wrote:
> > On Wed, 2019-05-01 at 13:04 -0700, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio wrote:
> > > Can you elaborate a bit more on what's the rationale for this? do
> > > you
> > > just want to avoid having too
On 5/1/19 2:04 PM, Summers, Stuart wrote:
On Wed, 2019-05-01 at 13:04 -0700, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio wrote:
Can you elaborate a bit more on what's the rationale for this? do
you
just want to avoid having too many inlines since the paths they're
used
in are not critical, or do you have some more
On Wed, 2019-05-01 at 13:04 -0700, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio wrote:
> Can you elaborate a bit more on what's the rationale for this? do
> you
> just want to avoid having too many inlines since the paths they're
> used
> in are not critical, or do you have some more functional reason? This
> is
> no
Can you elaborate a bit more on what's the rationale for this? do you
just want to avoid having too many inlines since the paths they're used
in are not critical, or do you have some more functional reason? This is
not a critic to the patch, I just want to understand where you're coming
from ;)
Additionally, ensure these are all prefixed with intel_sseu_*
to match the convention of other functions in i915.
Signed-off-by: Stuart Summers
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.c | 54 +++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.h | 57 +++-
drivers/gpu/d
Additionally, ensure these are all prefixed with intel_sseu_*
to match the convention of other functions in i915.
Signed-off-by: Stuart Summers
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.c | 54 +++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_sseu.h | 57 +++-
drivers/gpu/d
10 matches
Mail list logo
