On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 08:51:03AM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> I really didn't like this implementation because I'm using the global
> variable in the test case.
>
> So I think also providing a define igt_skip_function_on_dryrun() if
> (igt_dry_run) return 0 is more igt like.
>
> For psr I need
I really didn't like this implementation because I'm using the global
variable in the test case.
So I think also providing a define igt_skip_function_on_dryrun() if
(igt_dry_run) return 0 is more igt like.
For psr I need a way to run the testcases even when PSR is disabled to know
what to expect
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 06:22:51PM -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> This allows to run tests with psr disabled and know what to expect when
> PSR is actually enabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi
I don't really follow what this is useful for ... Can you please elaborate
how this is used and how i
This allows to run tests with psr disabled and know what to expect when
PSR is actually enabled.
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi
---
tests/kms_psr_sink_crc.c | 8
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tests/kms_psr_sink_crc.c b/tests/kms_psr_sink_crc.c
index 51e54a7..1380ca4 100644
This allows to run tests with psr disabled and know what to expect when
PSR is actually enabled.
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi
---
tests/kms_psr_sink_crc.c | 8
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tests/kms_psr_sink_crc.c b/tests/kms_psr_sink_crc.c
index 51e54a7..1380ca4 100644
