Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: Split ctx timestamp selftest into two

2020-04-22 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Mika Kuoppala (2020-04-21 15:29:32) > We use different workarounds for render engine than > for other engines. Split the selftest according to these > types so that we get error rates per workaround. > > Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala ~o~ If you think it's useful, Reviewed-by: Chris Wilso

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: Split ctx timestamp selftest into two

2020-04-21 Thread Mika Kuoppala
We use different workarounds for render engine than for other engines. Split the selftest according to these types so that we get error rates per workaround. Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c | 23 --- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 3

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: Split ctx timestamp selftest into two

2020-04-21 Thread Mika Kuoppala
Chris Wilson writes: > Quoting Mika Kuoppala (2020-04-21 14:16:33) >> @@ -4774,6 +4773,12 @@ static int live_lrc_timestamp(void *arg) >> unsigned long heartbeat; >> int i, err = 0; >> >> + if (rcs && data.engine->class != RENDER_CLASS) >> +

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: Split ctx timestamp selftest into two

2020-04-21 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Mika Kuoppala (2020-04-21 14:16:33) > @@ -4774,6 +4773,12 @@ static int live_lrc_timestamp(void *arg) > unsigned long heartbeat; > int i, err = 0; > > + if (rcs && data.engine->class != RENDER_CLASS) > + continue; > + > +

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: Split ctx timestamp selftest into two

2020-04-21 Thread Mika Kuoppala
We use different workarounds for render engine than for other engines. Split the selftest according to these types so that we get error rates per workaround. Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c | 26 +++--- 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+),