Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: Move the remaining gtt code

2012-11-04 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 09:21:31AM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote: > It's pretty much all consolidated now that we've killed AGP. We can move > the one outlier, and defines too. > > (Kill some unused defines in the process) > > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky > Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson Entire series m

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: Move the remaining gtt code

2012-11-04 Thread Ben Widawsky
It's pretty much all consolidated now that we've killed AGP. We can move the one outlier, and defines too. (Kill some unused defines in the process) Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 62 -- drivers/gpu/dr

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: Move the remaining gtt code

2012-11-02 Thread Chris Wilson
Only spotted the one issue in the patchset, so other than patch 3, Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/lis

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: Move the remaining gtt code

2012-11-01 Thread Ben Widawsky
It's pretty much all consolidated now that we've killed AGP. We can move the one outlier, and defines too. (Kill some unused defines in the process) Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 62 -- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c | 76