On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 11:12:20AM -0800, Matt Roper wrote:
> I think the only thing we need to close on is Ville's concern about the
> plane winding up with non-NULL fb and crtc pointers even though a crazy
> firmware or bootloader somehow left the plane turned off. I'm not super
> familiar with
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 06:58:06PM +, Damien Lespiau wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 10:10:26AM -0800, Matt Roper wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 05:22:19PM +, Damien Lespiau wrote:
> > > Right now, we get a warning when taking over the firmware fb:
> > >
> > > [drm:drm_atomic_plane_
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 10:10:26AM -0800, Matt Roper wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 05:22:19PM +, Damien Lespiau wrote:
> > Right now, we get a warning when taking over the firmware fb:
> >
> > [drm:drm_atomic_plane_check] FB set but no CRTC
> >
> > with the following backtrace:
> >
> >
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 10:10:26AM -0800, Matt Roper wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 05:22:19PM +, Damien Lespiau wrote:
> > Right now, we get a warning when taking over the firmware fb:
> >
> > [drm:drm_atomic_plane_check] FB set but no CRTC
> >
> > with the following backtrace:
> >
> >
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 05:22:19PM +, Damien Lespiau wrote:
> Right now, we get a warning when taking over the firmware fb:
>
> [drm:drm_atomic_plane_check] FB set but no CRTC
>
> with the following backtrace:
>
> [] drm_atomic_check_only+0x35d/0x510 [drm]
> [] drm_atomic_commit+0x17/0
Right now, we get a warning when taking over the firmware fb:
[drm:drm_atomic_plane_check] FB set but no CRTC
with the following backtrace:
[] drm_atomic_check_only+0x35d/0x510 [drm]
[] drm_atomic_commit+0x17/0x60 [drm]
[] drm_atomic_helper_plane_set_property+0x8d/0xd0
[drm_kms_helper]