On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 01:59:17PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 04:30:43PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > It's quite common for an object to simply be on the inactive list (and
> > not unbound) when we want to free the context. This of course happens
> > with lazy unbinding
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 04:30:43PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> It's quite common for an object to simply be on the inactive list (and
> not unbound) when we want to free the context. This of course happens
> with lazy unbinding. Simply, this is needed when an object isn't fully
> unbound but we wa
It's quite common for an object to simply be on the inactive list (and
not unbound) when we want to free the context. This of course happens
with lazy unbinding. Simply, this is needed when an object isn't fully
unbound but we want to free one VMA of the object, for whatever reason.
Signed-off-by:
