On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 03:23:33PM +, Mateo Lozano, Oscar wrote:
> > > > - Ack the interrupt inmediately, before trying to handle it (fix for
> > > > missing interrupts by Bob Beckett ).
> > >
> > > This interrupt handling change is interesting since it might explain
> > > our irq handling woes
> > > - Ack the interrupt inmediately, before trying to handle it (fix for
> > > missing interrupts by Bob Beckett ).
> >
> > This interrupt handling change is interesting since it might explain
> > our irq handling woes on gen5+ with the two-level GT interrupt handling
> scheme.
> > Can you please
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Vetter [mailto:daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch] On Behalf Of Daniel
> Vetter
> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2014 12:52 PM
> To: Mateo Lozano, Oscar
> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Daniel, Thomas
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 40/50]
On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 01:09:10PM +0100, oscar.ma...@intel.com wrote:
> From: Thomas Daniel
>
> Handle all context status events in the context status buffer on every
> context switch interrupt. We only remove work from the execlist queue
> after a context status buffer reports that it has compl
From: Thomas Daniel
Handle all context status events in the context status buffer on every
context switch interrupt. We only remove work from the execlist queue
after a context status buffer reports that it has completed and we only
attempt to schedule new contexts on interrupt when a previously
