On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> I'm not sure what's the problem with the current code. Could you
> please explain a little bit more? After a brief look at
> intel_enable_pch_pll and intel_disable_pch_pll it seems our code does
> try to check the pll refcount and behave corre
Hi
2012/10/26 Daniel Vetter :
> Atm we have a few funny issues where we enable/disable shared
> pll clocks. To make it clear that we are not required to enable/
> disable the pch plls together with the other pch resources (and
> so should keep it running when it's used by another pipe in
> a share
Atm we have a few funny issues where we enable/disable shared
pll clocks. To make it clear that we are not required to enable/
disable the pch plls together with the other pch resources (and
so should keep it running when it's used by another pipe in
a shared pll configuration) add a comment.
This
