On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 11:18:05PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 10:30:36AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 11:23:17AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 10:00:51AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 10:30
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 10:30:36AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 11:23:17AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 10:00:51AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 10:30:23AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > > With the new DRRS code it kin
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 11:23:17AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 10:00:51AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 10:30:23AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > With the new DRRS code it kinda sticks out, and we never managed to
> > > get this to work well eno
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 10:00:51AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 10:30:23AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > With the new DRRS code it kinda sticks out, and we never managed to
> > get this to work well enough without causing issues. Time to wave
> > goodbye.
> >
> > I've dec
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 10:30:23AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> With the new DRRS code it kinda sticks out, and we never managed to
> get this to work well enough without causing issues. Time to wave
> goodbye.
>
> I've decided to keep the logic for programming the reduced clocks
> intact, but ev
With the new DRRS code it kinda sticks out, and we never managed to
get this to work well enough without causing issues. Time to wave
goodbye.
I've decided to keep the logic for programming the reduced clocks
intact, but everything else is gone. If anyone ever wants to resurrect
this we need to re
