On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 07, 2015 at 08:29:49AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
>> On 3 November 2015 at 22:31, Patrik Jakobsson
>> wrote:
>> > We need DC5/DC6 to be disabled around modesets to prevent confusing the
>> > DMC. Also, we've run out of bits in th
On Sat, Nov 07, 2015 at 08:29:49AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On 3 November 2015 at 22:31, Patrik Jakobsson
> wrote:
> > We need DC5/DC6 to be disabled around modesets to prevent confusing the
> > DMC. Also, we've run out of bits in the 32 bit power domain mask so now
> > it's a 64 bit mask.
> >
On 3 November 2015 at 22:31, Patrik Jakobsson
wrote:
> We need DC5/DC6 to be disabled around modesets to prevent confusing the
> DMC. Also, we've run out of bits in the 32 bit power domain mask so now
> it's a 64 bit mask.
>
It was bad enough the original code used unsigned long so was
different
Hi,
On 6 November 2015 at 13:53, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On 5 November 2015 at 17:12, Patrik Jakobsson
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Daniel Stone wrote:
>>> On 3 November 2015 at 12:31, Patrik Jakobsson
>>> wrote:
We need DC5/DC6 to be disabled around modesets to prevent confu
Hi,
On 6 November 2015 at 14:17, Imre Deak wrote:
> On pe, 2015-11-06 at 13:53 +, Daniel Stone wrote:
>> On 5 November 2015 at 17:12, Patrik Jakobsson
>> wrote:
>> > Ah yes, we carry the mask around there as well. Thanks for catching
>> > that. I like the move of POWER_DOMAIN_MODESET into pu
On pe, 2015-11-06 at 13:53 +, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 5 November 2015 at 17:12, Patrik Jakobsson
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Daniel Stone
> > wrote:
> > > On 3 November 2015 at 12:31, Patrik Jakobsson
> > > wrote:
> > > > We need DC5/DC6 to be disabled around modes
Hi,
On 5 November 2015 at 17:12, Patrik Jakobsson
wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Daniel Stone wrote:
>> On 3 November 2015 at 12:31, Patrik Jakobsson
>> wrote:
>>> We need DC5/DC6 to be disabled around modesets to prevent confusing the
>>> DMC. Also, we've run out of bits in the 32 bi
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 3 November 2015 at 12:31, Patrik Jakobsson
> wrote:
>> We need DC5/DC6 to be disabled around modesets to prevent confusing the
>> DMC. Also, we've run out of bits in the 32 bit power domain mask so now
>> it's a 64 bit mask.
>
> The
Hi,
On 3 November 2015 at 12:31, Patrik Jakobsson
wrote:
> We need DC5/DC6 to be disabled around modesets to prevent confusing the
> DMC. Also, we've run out of bits in the 32 bit power domain mask so now
> it's a 64 bit mask.
There are quite a lot of users in intel_display.c (search for
put_dom
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 6:29 PM, Ville Syrjälä
wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 01:31:10PM +0100, Patrik Jakobsson wrote:
>> We need DC5/DC6 to be disabled around modesets to prevent confusing the
>> DMC. Also, we've run out of bits in the 32 bit power domain mask so now
>> it's a 64 bit mask.
>
>
On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 01:31:10PM +0100, Patrik Jakobsson wrote:
> We need DC5/DC6 to be disabled around modesets to prevent confusing the
> DMC. Also, we've run out of bits in the 32 bit power domain mask so now
> it's a 64 bit mask.
We could get back 4 bits by squashing each 2 and 4 lane DDI po
We need DC5/DC6 to be disabled around modesets to prevent confusing the
DMC. Also, we've run out of bits in the 32 bit power domain mask so now
it's a 64 bit mask.
Signed-off-by: Patrik Jakobsson
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 2 ++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 3 ++-
12 matches
Mail list logo
