On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 12:27:25AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 03:11:07PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 11:22:00AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > For some reason snb has 2 fields to set ppgtt cacheability. This one
> > > here does not exist on g
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 03:11:07PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 11:22:00AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > For some reason snb has 2 fields to set ppgtt cacheability. This one
> > here does not exist on gen7.
> >
> > This might explain why ppgtt wasn't a win on snb like on
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 11:22:00AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> For some reason snb has 2 fields to set ppgtt cacheability. This one
> here does not exist on gen7.
>
> This might explain why ppgtt wasn't a win on snb like on ivb - not
> enough pte caching.
So, is it a win now?
>
> Signed-Off-
For some reason snb has 2 fields to set ppgtt cacheability. This one
here does not exist on gen7.
This might explain why ppgtt wasn't a win on snb like on ivb - not
enough pte caching.
Signed-Off-by: Daniel Vetter
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c |3 +++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h |
