Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/7] drm/i915: Check PIN_NONFAULT overlaps in evict_for_node

2017-10-09 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Joonas Lahtinen (2017-10-09 13:17:24) > On Mon, 2017-10-09 at 09:43 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > If the caller says that he doesn't want to evict any other faulting > > vma, honour that flag. The logic was used in evict_something, but not > > the more specific evict_for_node, now being us

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/7] drm/i915: Check PIN_NONFAULT overlaps in evict_for_node

2017-10-09 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
On Mon, 2017-10-09 at 09:43 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > If the caller says that he doesn't want to evict any other faulting > vma, honour that flag. The logic was used in evict_something, but not > the more specific evict_for_node, now being used as a preliminary probe > since commit 606fec956c0e

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/7] drm/i915: Check PIN_NONFAULT overlaps in evict_for_node

2017-10-09 Thread Chris Wilson
If the caller says that he doesn't want to evict any other faulting vma, honour that flag. The logic was used in evict_something, but not the more specific evict_for_node, now being used as a preliminary probe since commit 606fec956c0e ("drm/i915: Prefer random replacement before eviction search").