On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 02:10:07PM +0300, David Weinehall wrote:
> In an effort to simplify things for a future push of dev_priv instead
> of dev wherever possible, always take pdev via dev_priv where
> feasible, eliminating the direct access from dev. Right now this
> only eliminates a few cases o
In an effort to simplify things for a future push of dev_priv instead
of dev wherever possible, always take pdev via dev_priv where
feasible, eliminating the direct access from dev. Right now this
only eliminates a few cases of dev, but it also obviates that we pass
dev into a lot of functions wher
