>
> Iirc it was in the ddx, and it was actually using the mmap code. Leftovers
> from ums, but unfortunately X crashes if we take them away. If I recall
> correctly nouveau was in staging still, but per Linus staging or not
> doesn't matter when distros are shipping with the code already. I did dig
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 01:29:21PM +, Antoine, Peter wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-04-28 at 16:08 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 11:29:06AM +, Antoine, Peter wrote:
> > > > > > diff --git a/include/drm/drmP.h b/include/drm/drmP.h index
> > > > > > 62c40777..367e42f 100644
On Tue, 2015-04-28 at 16:08 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 11:29:06AM +, Antoine, Peter wrote:
> > > > > diff --git a/include/drm/drmP.h b/include/drm/drmP.h index
> > > > > 62c40777..367e42f 100644
> > > > > --- a/include/drm/drmP.h
> > > > > +++ b/include/drm/drmP.h
>
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 11:29:06AM +, Antoine, Peter wrote:
> > > > diff --git a/include/drm/drmP.h b/include/drm/drmP.h index
> > > > 62c40777..367e42f 100644
> > > > --- a/include/drm/drmP.h
> > > > +++ b/include/drm/drmP.h
> > > > @@ -137,17 +137,18 @@ void drm_err(const char *format, ...);
.intel.com]
> > Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 6:04 PM
> > To: Antoine, Peter
> > Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; airl...@redhat.com;
> > dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org; daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch
> > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/5] drm: Make HW_LOCK access funct
lists.freedesktop.org; airl...@redhat.com;
> dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org; daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/5] drm: Make HW_LOCK access functions
> optional.
>
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 03:07:57PM +0100, Peter Antoine wrote:
> > As these functions ar
: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/5] drm: Make HW_LOCK access functions
optional.
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 03:07:57PM +0100, Peter Antoine wrote:
> As these functions are only used by one driver and there are security
> holes in these functions. Make the functions optional.
>
> Issue: VIZ-5485
>
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 03:07:57PM +0100, Peter Antoine wrote:
> As these functions are only used by one driver and there are security holes
> in these functions. Make the functions optional.
>
> Issue: VIZ-5485
> Signed-off-by: Peter Antoine
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_lock.c| 6 ++
As these functions are only used by one driver and there are security holes
in these functions. Make the functions optional.
Issue: VIZ-5485
Signed-off-by: Peter Antoine
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_lock.c| 6 ++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c | 3 +++
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau
