On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 04:23:26PM -0600, Jeff McGee wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 05:50:04PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 10:24:53AM -0600, Jeff McGee wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 08:46:45PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 03:54:50P
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 05:50:04PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 10:24:53AM -0600, Jeff McGee wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 08:46:45PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 03:54:50PM -0600, jeff.mc...@intel.com wrote:
> > > > From: Jeff McGee
> > >
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 10:24:53AM -0600, Jeff McGee wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 08:46:45PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 03:54:50PM -0600, jeff.mc...@intel.com wrote:
> > > From: Jeff McGee
> > >
> > > The current frequency should reach the minimum frequency within
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 08:46:45PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 03:54:50PM -0600, jeff.mc...@intel.com wrote:
> > From: Jeff McGee
> >
> > The current frequency should reach the minimum frequency within a
> > reasonable time during idle.
> >
> > v2: Not using forcewake f
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 03:54:50PM -0600, jeff.mc...@intel.com wrote:
> From: Jeff McGee
>
> The current frequency should reach the minimum frequency within a
> reasonable time during idle.
>
> v2: Not using forcewake for this particular subtest per Daniel's
> suggestion.
>
> Signed-off-by:
From: Jeff McGee
The current frequency should reach the minimum frequency within a
reasonable time during idle.
v2: Not using forcewake for this particular subtest per Daniel's
suggestion.
Signed-off-by: Jeff McGee
---
tests/pm_rps.c | 22 ++
1 file changed, 18 inserti