On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 10:00:54AM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 14:04:00 +0100, Daniel Vetter
> wrote:
> > We still have reports of missed irqs even on Sandybridge with the
> > HWSTAM workaround in place. Testing by the bug reporter gets rid of
> > them with the forcewake vood
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 14:04:00 +0100, Daniel Vetter
wrote:
> We still have reports of missed irqs even on Sandybridge with the
> HWSTAM workaround in place. Testing by the bug reporter gets rid of
> them with the forcewake voodoo and no HWSTAM writes.
>
> Because I've slightly botched the rebasing
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 02:04:00PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> We still have reports of missed irqs even on Sandybridge with the
> HWSTAM workaround in place. Testing by the bug reporter gets rid of
> them with the forcewake voodoo and no HWSTAM writes.
>
> Because I've slightly botched the reba
We still have reports of missed irqs even on Sandybridge with the
HWSTAM workaround in place. Testing by the bug reporter gets rid of
them with the forcewake voodoo and no HWSTAM writes.
Because I've slightly botched the rebasing I've left out the ACTHD
readback which is also required to get IVB w
