On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 17:37, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 19:22:00 -0800
> Ben Widawsky wrote:
>
> > Many of the old fields from Ironlake have gone away. Strip all those
> > fields, and try to update to fields people care about. RC information
> > isn't exactly ideal anymore. All w
On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 19:22:00 -0800
Ben Widawsky wrote:
> Many of the old fields from Ironlake have gone away. Strip all those
> fields, and try to update to fields people care about. RC information
> isn't exactly ideal anymore. All we can guarantee when we read the
> register is that we're not u
On 12/12/2011 07:22 PM, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> Many of the old fields from Ironlake have gone away. Strip all those
> fields, and try to update to fields people care about. RC information
> isn't exactly ideal anymore. All we can guarantee when we read the
> register is that we're not using forcewak
Many of the old fields from Ironlake have gone away. Strip all those
fields, and try to update to fields people care about. RC information
isn't exactly ideal anymore. All we can guarantee when we read the
register is that we're not using forcewake, ie. the software isn't
forcing the hardware to st