On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 4:10 AM Matthew Auld
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 at 16:23, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 9:52 AM Tvrtko Ursulin
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 15/07/2021 11:15, Matthew Auld wrote:
> > > > The CPU domain should be static for discrete, and on DG
On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 at 16:23, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 9:52 AM Tvrtko Ursulin
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 15/07/2021 11:15, Matthew Auld wrote:
> > > The CPU domain should be static for discrete, and on DG1 we don't need
> > > any flushing since everything is already coherent
On 16/07/2021 16:23, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 9:52 AM Tvrtko Ursulin
wrote:
On 15/07/2021 11:15, Matthew Auld wrote:
The CPU domain should be static for discrete, and on DG1 we don't need
any flushing since everything is already coherent, so really all this
does is an o
On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 9:52 AM Tvrtko Ursulin
wrote:
>
>
> On 15/07/2021 11:15, Matthew Auld wrote:
> > The CPU domain should be static for discrete, and on DG1 we don't need
> > any flushing since everything is already coherent, so really all this
> > does is an object wait, for which we have an
On 15/07/2021 11:15, Matthew Auld wrote:
The CPU domain should be static for discrete, and on DG1 we don't need
any flushing since everything is already coherent, so really all this
does is an object wait, for which we have an ioctl. Longer term the
desired caching should be an immutable creatio
The CPU domain should be static for discrete, and on DG1 we don't need
any flushing since everything is already coherent, so really all this
does is an object wait, for which we have an ioctl. Longer term the
desired caching should be an immutable creation time property for the
BO, which can be set
