On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 03:55:28PM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 11:16:33PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Quoting Rodrigo Vivi (2019-04-25 22:50:37)
> > > No functional change. But by making those bits together
> > > we will be able to convert many functions to pass
> > > in
On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 11:16:33PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Rodrigo Vivi (2019-04-25 22:50:37)
> > No functional change. But by making those bits together
> > we will be able to convert many functions to pass
> > intel_irq instead of i915_private or uncore.
> >
> > For gen8+ "gt_" pref
Quoting Rodrigo Vivi (2019-04-25 22:50:37)
> No functional change. But by making those bits together
> we will be able to convert many functions to pass
> intel_irq instead of i915_private or uncore.
>
> For gen8+ "gt_" prefix would be better than pm_ on them
> since these regs include more stuff
No functional change. But by making those bits together
we will be able to convert many functions to pass
intel_irq instead of i915_private or uncore.
For gen8+ "gt_" prefix would be better than pm_ on them
since these regs include more stuff then PM, but let's
keep for legacy reasons.
Signed-off
