On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 10:52:36AM -0700, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
> On 05/02/2013 10:48 AM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> >Supposedly we should use the DAC divider for <300MHz pixel clocks, but as
> >that doesn't actually work as well as the high freq divider here in
> >practice, just use the high freq divi
On 05/02/2013 10:48 AM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
Supposedly we should use the DAC divider for <300MHz pixel clocks, but as
that doesn't actually work as well as the high freq divider here in
practice, just use the high freq divider all the time.
v2: remove unconditional write (Jesse)
check for p
Supposedly we should use the DAC divider for <300MHz pixel clocks, but as
that doesn't actually work as well as the high freq divider here in
practice, just use the high freq divider all the time.
v2: remove unconditional write (Jesse)
check for pixel rate properly (Jesse)
v3: give up, the DAC
