On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 06:00:03PM +0100, John Harrison wrote:
> On 26/06/2015 14:34, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 01:58:11PM +0100, john.c.harri...@intel.com wrote:
> >>From: John Harrison
> >>
> >>The intended usage model for struct fence is that the signalled status
> >>shoul
On 26/06/2015 14:34, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 01:58:11PM +0100, john.c.harri...@intel.com wrote:
From: John Harrison
The intended usage model for struct fence is that the signalled status should be
set on demand rather than polled. That is, there should not be a need for a
'
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 01:58:11PM +0100, john.c.harri...@intel.com wrote:
> From: John Harrison
>
> The intended usage model for struct fence is that the signalled status should
> be
> set on demand rather than polled. That is, there should not be a need for a
> 'signaled' function to be called
From: John Harrison
The intended usage model for struct fence is that the signalled status should be
set on demand rather than polled. That is, there should not be a need for a
'signaled' function to be called everytime the status is queried. Instead,
'something' should be done to enable a signal
