Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915: Build workaround list in ring initialization

2014-10-21 Thread Mika Kuoppala
Mika Kuoppala writes: > If we build the workaround list in ring initialization > and decouple it from the actual writing of values, we > gain the ability to decide where and how we want to apply > the values. > > The advantage of this will become more clear when > we need to initialize workaround

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915: Build workaround list in ring initialization

2014-10-21 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 05:13:45PM +0100, Siluvery, Arun wrote: > On 07/10/2014 15:21, Mika Kuoppala wrote: > >If we build the workaround list in ring initialization > >and decouple it from the actual writing of values, we > >gain the ability to decide where and how we want to apply > >the values.

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915: Build workaround list in ring initialization

2014-10-20 Thread Siluvery, Arun
On 07/10/2014 15:21, Mika Kuoppala wrote: If we build the workaround list in ring initialization and decouple it from the actual writing of values, we gain the ability to decide where and how we want to apply the values. The advantage of this will become more clear when we need to initialize wor

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915: Build workaround list in ring initialization

2014-10-13 Thread Siluvery, Arun
On 07/10/2014 15:21, Mika Kuoppala wrote: If we build the workaround list in ring initialization and decouple it from the actual writing of values, we gain the ability to decide where and how we want to apply the values. The advantage of this will become more clear when we need to initialize wor

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915: Build workaround list in ring initialization

2014-10-07 Thread Mika Kuoppala
If we build the workaround list in ring initialization and decouple it from the actual writing of values, we gain the ability to decide where and how we want to apply the values. The advantage of this will become more clear when we need to initialize workarounds on older gens where it is not possi