Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: kicking rings considered harmful

2011-10-03 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Sat, Oct 01, 2011 at 11:09:33PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 20:59:28 -0700 > Eric Anholt wrote: > > > On Sat, 1 Oct 2011 19:15:19 -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > > > From: Daniel Vetter > > > > > > Only do it in the hope of resurrecting the gpu. Disable when reset is > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: kicking rings considered harmful

2011-10-01 Thread Ben Widawsky
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 20:59:28 -0700 Eric Anholt wrote: > On Sat, 1 Oct 2011 19:15:19 -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > > From: Daniel Vetter > > > > Only do it in the hope of resurrecting the gpu. Disable when reset is > > disabled because it seems to tremendously increases our changes to > > actua

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: kicking rings considered harmful

2011-10-01 Thread Eric Anholt
On Sat, 1 Oct 2011 19:15:19 -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > From: Daniel Vetter > > Only do it in the hope of resurrecting the gpu. Disable when reset is > disabled because it seems to tremendously increases our changes to > actually capture an error_state before the system goes all belly-up. Thi

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: kicking rings considered harmful

2011-10-01 Thread Ben Widawsky
From: Daniel Vetter Only do it in the hope of resurrecting the gpu. Disable when reset is disabled because it seems to tremendously increases our changes to actually capture an error_state before the system goes all belly-up. Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky --- driver