Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: Simplify gem stolen initialization.

2016-12-19 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 01:36:28PM -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > Let's take usage of IS_LP to simplify the gem stolen > initialization as suggest by Tvrtko. > > Also assume that all new LP platforms follows the chv+ > and others bdw+. > > Broxton and Geminilake were probably using the incorrect pa

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: Simplify gem stolen initialization.

2016-12-18 Thread Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
On Sun, 2016-12-18 at 13:36 -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > Let's take usage of IS_LP to simplify the gem stolen > initialization as suggest by Tvrtko. > > Also assume that all new LP platforms follows the chv+ > and others bdw+. > > Broxton and Geminilake were probably using the incorrect path > so

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: Simplify gem stolen initialization.

2016-12-18 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
Let's take usage of IS_LP to simplify the gem stolen initialization as suggest by Tvrtko. Also assume that all new LP platforms follows the chv+ and others bdw+. Broxton and Geminilake were probably using the incorrect path so far. Cc: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira Cc: Imre Deak Cc: Mika Kuoppal