On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 01:59:17PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 08:24:34PM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 22 +++---
> > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 07:24:23AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 11:20:14PM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 01:59:17PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > > Cool. This explains the bad DERRMR values I was seeing in in error
> > > states. I'm honestly didn'
On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 11:20:14PM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 01:59:17PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > Cool. This explains the bad DERRMR values I was seeing in in error
> > states. I'm honestly didn't check if we actually need an SRM for BDW
> > still, but I'll assume
On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 08:24:34PM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 22 +++---
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/
On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 01:59:17PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> Cool. This explains the bad DERRMR values I was seeing in in error
> states. I'm honestly didn't check if we actually need an SRM for BDW
> still, but I'll assume you did check.
Just checked, the LRI command still mentions that we nee
Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 22 +++---
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
index 3697433..a646ed4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/
